All the recriminations and proclamations and resignations, I finally read the now-infamous fictional-or-not premarital sex piece in the YU Beacon and have only one reaction after all the press, all the controversy.
As with, did this pareve, p rly-written, not-entirely-credible account of first-time guilt-ridden yeshiva intercourse actually ignite the firestorm of debate which has dominated papers, blog sites and Shabbat dining table discussion?
The t -hot-to-handle story is tame into the maximum. It feels significantly less than authentic to some extent because it is inconsistent. One second the narrator is within her lace undies, the next minute her fan is removing her clothing. Its trajectory is toward shame, remorse and regret, hardly enjoyment if not fun.
The author appears to be laboring underneath the myth that, most importantly, intercourse is definitely an academic experience, with all the concept embedded when you l k at the kicker associated with piece “the thing we learn is simple tips to do the walk of shame a single day after.”
Gawd. It reminds me of every wide range of cautionary Young Adult novels my mom delivered my way whenever I had been a pre-teen as well as the tales We kept hearing about girls who had been unwise adequate to have premarital intercourse and finished up having a baby and dying from unlawful abortions or needing to set up their illegitimate offspring for use. (the truth that I happened to be used had been only a confusing information.)